GenXwords

Posts Tagged ‘traditionalists’

Retirement, welcome it.

In Work Values on October 13, 2011 at 8:46 pm

The wave has begun…and if you’re not with me here, I speak of the tsunami of  impending retirements in the nonprofit and government sectors that is headed toward us quickly.  Many studies have predicted this, but the economic down turn and drop in retirement accounts of our boomer friends delayed it briefly.   We are seeing the beginning of a mass exodus.  I’ve noticed the shift starting just in the last 9 months,  in my small community, with my clients and the organizations I work and volunteer with.  What is more concerning than the shift, is the response.  The shock, dismay and fear I’ve seen on faces when boomer executives give notice is quickly accompanied with “how are we going to replace you?”, “how can we find somebody to manage all that you do every day?” and most famously  ”there is nobody here that can do or is willing to do your job, what are we going to do?”

Did you hear that sound?  It was the collective sigh of frustration of my GenX colleagues.  For nearly two decades, my generation has been overlooked far more than our predecessors were when they were our age, and with bigger economic impact.  The majority of GenX’ers in public/government jobs and NPO’s are still in middle management, with huge student loan debt, little to no retirement savings and working under a “grey ceiling.” To top it off, we are the generation with a disproportionate percentage of mortgage crisis victims, we are the first generation in the history of our country to NOT do as well financially as our parents and we have workaholic boomers and traditionalists who just won’t retire.  Add to that, the prevailing GenX belief that there are many ways we could and should do business differently than our predecessors…if we only had a chance.  So yes, we have some anxious X’ers wanting to step into those executive jobs that boomers are vacating, and we welcome the tsunami.

The dichotomy between the anxious ready to change things up get out of my way X’ers and the fear of the unknown/there is nobody who will do it like me and with my experience attitude of the boomers is played out nearly every time I hear the word retirement.  Which is usually followed by a tense argument about the value of experience vs. the value of pragmatic results based leadership. Then it quickly degrades into dissent about who are we going to hire to fill this void?

The solution you ask?  Well for one, I’d suggest you approach the void by not looking at it as a void.  The tsunami of job title transitions is an opportunity for change and growth.   Both GenX and Millennials are already in the trenches and we surpass boomers and traditionalists in academic preparation, prior volunteer experience and innovative entrepreneurial ventures. Instead of looking for somebody to fill your shoes, look for somebody to provide a new direction and a breath of fresh air.  Approaching recruitment, even in this economic time, with an opportunity lens will likely get you the candidates you really want, not the warmed over mediocre version of what you already have.  Secondly, LISTEN.  The majority culture (boomers in this case) are classic for “knowing” what is right, but not always seeing alternatives that might also be reality.   Lastly, have a robust and diverse hiring committee, comprised of various generations, experience levels and expertise areas.  THIS will bring in your best candidates and your best match, regardless of generation.

As for retirement.  Welcome it, embrace it, it is not to be feared. Being a GenX ”slacker”, I look forward to the days that I get to retire and choose how I spend every moment of every day. Welcome it!

Engaging multiple generations in your meetings

In Technology, Uncategorized, Work Values on August 12, 2010 at 3:07 pm

MEETINGS…in all their glory, are an obvious reoccurring theme in this blog.

I’ve gotten a lot of  feedback about my critique of meetings, largely from friends in the corporate or for-profit fields.  Often their comments sound  like this  “seriously?  I would walk out of a meeting that was that pointless, time is money” or “if somebody is multi-tasking in a meeting, either the meeting doesn’t have enough focus, or the people in your meeting are the wrong ones”.   Interesting points….which makes me ask if meetings in the non-profit and public sector are different from those in the for profit world.  The ultimate goal of the for profit industry is to make more money-so naturally meetings would be a strategy to make this happen.  The goal of organizations in the non-profit sector is varied and sometimes foggy. This reality can create a meeting monster that results in confusion of the meeting purpose and varying levels of disengagement from those in the meeting.  Engaging people in a meeting with a foggy goal or purpose is difficult at best.  Add generational differences in how we define the goals and purpose of organizations and it gets uglier.

One strategy for success in negotiating this mess is good meeting management & understanding how to engage people of all generations in meetings. I’ve discussed the purpose of meetings  in other posts but how we build our agendas, what we do in meetings and how we deal with the need to engage our volunteers and staff  is worth more discussion.

How to engage gen X you ask?  Well….here is an example of how not to engage younger generations….

I recently sat through a two-hour meeting where all we did was share information about what we were busy doing, tasks people planned to do and information on things we could do.  I think eating a dirt sandwich would be more enjoyable and worthwhile.  I would rather hear about what you accomplished and how it has resulted in change or allow me to chime in with my thoughts about a decision that needs to be made. Spending valuable face to face time just chatting about information I could spend 5 minutes reading in a written report is not a good use of my time.  I would prefer to come to a meeting to make a decision, share information you are not able to get elsewhere and capitalize on the group dynamic to get discussion and movement toward a common goal.

But that is just me.

I’ve observed that some people find great value in spending entire meetings sharing information and talking about activities, namely boomers and traditionalists.  The process of sharing information is a strategy left over from days where instant electronic messages, online information sharing and anytime/anyplace communication strategies were not so prevalent.  You had to wait until you saw a person face to face to get their report-or wait for snail mail to send it to you after somebody typed it out on a typewriter.  Meeting agenda’s are still built around “old business” and “new business”, committee reports etc. . It is an unusual meeting agenda that is built around what outcomes have resulted from activities or what decisions do we need to make today in this meeting.

The solution?….. having a meeting with a good healthy mix of strategy and creative management for the group you are leading.  First, be clear about why you are meeting.  Meeting for the sake of meeting is not quite at the level of Dante’s seven deadly sins…but seriously, be clear with your purpose of bringing people together.  Second, allow for sharing time for those that prefer that process.  Third, add in decisions that need to be made and outcomes that can be reported on from activity of the group.  If possible, ask the group what amount of each process they prefer.  If you have an entire group of GenX’ers I would guess you’d want to have written reports on progress/activity and spend more time on dialogue leading to decision-making.   Big group of boomers?….more time on sharing.

At the very least…consider your meeting management in the context of  generational difference.  Discuss what processes your group prefers and how to build your agenda around it.  I would bet the result would be more engagement and better  progress toward your goal.

Information…moving away from a scarcity model

In Technology, Work Values on February 18, 2010 at 1:23 pm

I was recently told by an elder (of the traditionalist generation) that once I joined his board, my job was to be “quiet for two years, then I can talk and contribute.”

It should not come as a surprise to anyone who has read this blog that being quiet is not my forte, nor is holding my tongue when I have something valuable to add or information to share.   My response you ask?  Initially, a chuckle as surely he was kidding.

But he was serious…totally serious.   He really believed that one needed to be informed by experience.  As he eloquently stated, one must take time to learn from those who control information because this is how it was always done.

Don’t get me wrong, I agree that listening and experience are very, very valuable and necessary.  The rub came with the suggestion that information I needed was controlled and certainly not accessible in other ways.  The disagreement was a difference in value of HOW the information was gained and the hierarchy it suggested.

Having grown up in the great depression, this gentleman was working from a scarcity model of information-where there truly was limited information available.  A model based on hierarchy and control.   Today,  information is much less scarce and in fact, almost anyone has access to it…good and bad information alike.

Just look at the google machine (and the recent Google Superbowl commercial ), we are beyond looking only at who controls  information, we are now at what do we do with the plethora of information available for consumption.  How do we explore all that is out there, filter what is useful and use it for the good of our groups and organizations?

The paradigm shift has already happened in how we GET information but how does one negotiate the different generational values placed on information, where it comes from and how and when to put it into action?  How can NFP organizations fully embrace this paradigm shift without loosing valuable elders?  And finaly…do I really have to wait two years before I can contribute information?  If so, I’m outta here…moving to a place where the information I share will be valued.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.